Google Chrome’s New Bookmark Manager Offers Nothing New For Power Users

It’s November, 2014. Bookmarks look a bit different than yesterday.

“Oh boy”, you might say, “the new Bookmark Manager for Chrome has finally arrived!”

Let’s see what has improved since the “old” version. Clicking the Star (Add to Bookmarks) gives us a new popup:

chrome-bookmarks-1

Ok…let’s navigate into Add to folder. Here’s where things start to get prickly…

chrome-bookmarks-2

…so what happens if we click the little arrow next to the Bookmarks bar folder above?

chrome-bookmarks-3

We get a tiny list of Bookmark folders to scroll through, or a button to View All Bookmarked Items.

Come on Google, still no filter box for quickly finding a folder to add a bookmark to? Still no option to sort all folders including their sub-folders alphabetically?

But good thing I can change the banner to an uglier one:

chrome-bookmarks-4

Epic fail.

To Infinity, and Beyond

At a minimum, bookmark managers should grant users the ability to find and manage a massive amount of bookmarks elegantly. Otherwise, what exactly do they manage?

Honestly, all I want from a bookmark manager are these few things:

  1. Adding a new bookmark to a folder quickly.
  2. The ability to locate a bookmark or folder quickly.
  3. Sorting all bookmarks in one step.

Adding a filter box for narrowing down folders/bookmarks by keyword would solve #1 and #2. As for #3…it’s not difficult, just implement that already!

Here’s what I don’t need:

  • A Tumblr-like wall for showing off my bookmarks.
  • Scrolling through a loooooong list of folders, or page of bookmarks, to find stuff and rediscover older things.
  • Several clicks through menus or screens to perform any kind of bookmark operation.
  • Manual sorting only. Newly added bookmarks and folders should stay in alphabetical order, if that’s the setting I chose before.

Chrome’s new Bookmark Manager satisfies none of these things. They’ve updated the styling of the UI and the presentation of bookmarks – see card layouts and quicksand animation. Basically they made it prettier without enhancing any functionality.

It’s as if they are re-inventing the wheel by developing a CMS around bookmarks, similar to WordPress or something. If so, why not implement the features which make a CMS useful, such as tagging and frequently used tags, publishing a set of bookmarks, sharing with a set of users, related bookmarks, trends, analytics, etc?

Worse, it’s as if Google is becoming increasingly disconnected with their end-users. In that case, I don’t have a problem publishing a few constructive criticisms. Maybe they don’t get enough feedback? Maybe they don’t care? Maybe the way I use bookmarks is negligible compared to most users? Maybe they want to stick ads in your bookmarks too? Maybe their agenda is even more top secret 🙂 One can only speculate at this point.

Consider the Pin It Button extension for Chrome, which adds a Pin It button to any image on the web that will post it to one of your Pinterest boards. Elegant and straight-forward! It’s what a user experience should be like.

Either way, I hate to see software evolve like this – shinier buttons, fancier animations, and random new features nobody needs (a bookmarks wall, auto-folders, bookmarking notes/images, quicksand). Despite all this shiny chrome, my first impression is lackluster. I get it, one day people will have the ability to bookmark things across the web and share it all, as if it was their WordPress, Tumblr, Instagram or Facebook, but we already have this technology today and it’s not really why I bookmark things in the first place.

We’re seeing the bookmark, the favorite, and the like button being treated as the same idea. They’re not the same, and the result of treating them as such isn’t pretty.

Google already has personalized search, so if that’s turned on, why not show a user’s related bookmarks right next to their Google search results? This would effectively allow users to manipulate their own search results somewhat, simply by bookmarking things. If that gets too confusing for users, split Google Search (for internet) and Google Search (for private user data) into two distinct portals.

What about Google Notebook? At one point I was using that for bookmarks, but they killed it off. Seems they just can’t get bookmarks right.

Is there an alternative?

For what it’s worth, I’ve also tried the popular bookmark extensions for Chrome such as Xmarks and YAGBE. I’ve also tried cloud bookmarking services such as Delicious and Google Notebook. Nope, these don’t fit the bill either.

Bypass the Bookmark Manager for Increased Productivity

It’s no wonder I’ve already resorted to using plain old file-system folders for my bookmarks, paired with Dropbox or Google Drive for syncing them between several computers. With this method I can easily store notes, images and bookmarks along with any other files in whatever folders I want, sort them by any property via a single click, or move/copy them around into various active projects that I’m working on for reference. I can have a bookmark stored in three folders at a time, if it pertains to three different projects I’m working on. It’s nice having this extra flexibility for incorporating bookmarks into my various workflows, which can’t always be said about bookmarks stored in the browser/cloud. I no longer rely on the cloud as a permanent location for this data; it’s all synced (backed up) across multiple computers and stored offline indefinitely, organized into folders for maintaining the bookmark’s original purpose and context.

Closing Words

A tree-view and a search box is what every Bookmark Manager should have for adding and navigating bookmarks.

Finally, it looks like the new Bookmark Manager in Chrome is nearly identical to the Opera 25 Visual Bookmarks feature. Which happens to look a lot like Dewey. Which happens to look a lot like Tumblr, Pinterest, and the number of other visual bookmarking services since 2011. Trends are trends, days become weeks, and eventually we’ll have new ones.

Did the over-abundant usage of “they” come off as biased? No worries, that was intentional, this is a criticism piece after all, opinions and nothing more. Not to outdo what others have already said in the past, I’ll close out this article by quoting StarsOnly from this thread, because history does sometimes repeat itself:

“I just want to pass on, that the new bookmark manager sucks really bad. HTML based really sucks bad. I really hate it bad. I badly hate it so badly that the word bad doesn’t even really begin to cover how bad it is. If you were to change it back to the way it was, that would be a really good thing. It would fill me with a sense of goodness. Where “bad” is the new black. “Good” is the new Ferrari red. Changing it back would fill, not only me, but the world with good.

Would it bring peace to the middle east? Stop the polarization of the country’s politics? Or keep Megan Fox from being in movies? No, probably not. But it would sure make it a lot easier to live with these things.”

What do you think of the new Bookmarks Manager in Chrome? What new features would you rather have? What do you believe to be the important aspects of a bookmark manager in general? I’d love to know, so leave your comments below!

Update December 3rd, 2014 – the new Bookmark Manager is still only available via the beta version of Chrome. The latest stable version of Chrome (39.0.2171.71 m) does not have this feature, and there’s no telling when it will.

Update December 5th, 2014 – I’m finding that it takes up to 8 seconds for the menu to appear after clicking the Star button in the address bar. It’s loading a bunch of meta (site thumbnail, maybe a recursive list of my bookmark folders, etc) before showing the menu. IMO, when a user performs such an action like clicking a button, you show them feedback right away and then start loading the meta, unless the loading takes less than 200ms. I’ve designed a lot of trees, but the method in my TreeView File Browser Component tutorial turns out to be the best I’ve discovered for UX, and in it I explain how to load meta before-hand while caching heavy I/O operations and handling recursion in a dynamic fashion.

References

Related

Tags: , , ,

13 Comments

  1. After weeks of searching, I haven’t found a way to regain the functionality of the previous chrome bookmarks manager: ex, save all tabs in a folder, reload all bm in a folder into a window; navigate sensibly, using a tree view. anything on the horizon that does not force me to use your out-of-browser solution? I really can’t believe there are so few people that are actually using bookmarks the way I do…

    • Enter this into your Chrome address bar:

      chrome://flags/

      Then look for the “Experimental bookmark manager” feature and disable it, then click the Relaunch Now button at the bottom. Chrome will restart and revert back to the old bookmark manager.

      Firefox bookmarks are great, I just wish Firefox would load tabs in separate processes. It’s what makes Chrome feel a bit more reliable at this point.

  2. Thanks for the hint. However, I’ve tried that before, this flag does not exist in my current version of Chrome, it seems they only had that in for a short time after wrecking the bookmarks function.

    • That’s too bad, I’ll let you know if I find a fix. I was using v39 beta m 64-bit and it let me disable the option just a few days ago.

      What’s your Chrome version? Check under Menu > About Google Chrome…

  3. Ah, I was using the recent stable built, now I switched to beta, it has the off switch, yoohoo! 🙂 But that’s still not a very stable situation, they might remove it at any time. I have never found a sizeable group of people that need the functionality, would be great to find one, to make sure chrome stays usable.

  4. Just a helpful tip to anyone who wants to disable this feature you might need to click on the “Relaunch Now” button on the bottom of the chrome://flags extension page for this to work. It wouldn’t work for me unless I did that. So the steps are the same, chrome://flags (in the address bar), find Enable Enhanced Bookmarks, click on Disable then scroll all the way to the bottom and click on the Relaunch Now button. Hopefully this fixes it!

  5. The new bookmark manager sucks big-time. Who asked for this garbage anyway? First thing I did was google and find a way to go back to the old one. Wasn’t hard to do since I’m not alone in thinking the new version SUCKS! If it’s not broke, don’t fix it! The new bookmark manager looks like it was designed by some intern with nothing to do but mess with things that nobody wanted them to mess with.

  6. An absolute waste of time; the previous manager was much more useful with its tree view in both the manager view and when adding a bookmark; I’ve stopped using the new interface, resorting to an explorer view from windows instead.

  7. Total utter shit – bring back the old one!

  8. Mike Gale says:

    What we all may need is a bookmark API that we can tell browsers to use IF WE WANT.

    In other words, you get the standard or if you want you get exactly what you want. Then those who have clear ideas can build their own bookmarking independent of the seemingly random decisions of some product team. The same across all browsers you use…

    • I know it’s been 3 months since you posted your comment, but I totally agree! There are cross-browser extensions that try to do this, but none of them I’ve used meet all the requirements. Imagine having your bookmarks in an XML file stored somewhere on the web like a secure Dropbox/SugarSync/OneDrive where you can use OAuth2/OpenID Connect to grant third-party programs and web sites/apps access to your bookmarks..no overhead for the end-user, the end-user has full control over who has access at any time, and it’s all built into the web as standard technology.

      Bookmarks are kind of like a journal + mind map for me, and I think we have a long way to go when it comes to organizing these things, given what’s being pushed on end-users these days by companies who can literally develop anything they want, or purchase any start-up they want. A tree or tagging system with quick search is a first step, and they’ve tossed it out. What the heck?

  9. unkwown user says:

    hello wheres your game engine script i want to use oh and your software section doesn’t work so its broken plz give the name of your game engine or source code plz 🙁 ……………………………… so yea not visiting this anymore found by google while searching for how make a JavaScript game engine without stupid jquery or another javascript framework so bye dude

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *